Being an entrepreneurial business leader is a big challenge.
It takes a combination of skill, personality and sheer endurance to do a tough
job day-in, day- out. It’s always been the case, but in the 21st
century there is unprecedented rate of change to be dealt with and that makes
the job a whole lot more challenging.
Markets are now continually being disrupted by combinations
of regulation, consolidation, globalisation and technology. For the past five
years these four horsemen of the economic apocalypse have galloped roughshod
over businesses, against a backdrop of severe recession in some parts of the
world and unprecedented growth in other regions. But if recent valuations of companies such as
Uber, Airbnb, Dropbox and Xiaomi are to
be believed boom - or even bubble – in
the West is back
The entrepreneurship demonstrated in these firms and their resulting
stratospheric valuations is so often based on exploiting or causing change in
the marketplace. But once the disruptive breakthrough has been made, and the
IPO achieved minting a fresh pack of billionaires, it can be downhill fast to
eventual oblivion.
Complacency creates
DetroitThat’s because the same things that create opportunity create threat as soon as a business model is established. And with complacency over this fact you get Detroit. No wonder that Albert Einstein defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result.
Of course, we all publically subscribe to the mantra of embracing
change, yet most of us would admit privately that it can be scary and hard to get
to grips with. Yet as leaders we are required to ensure our organisations stay
ahead of the pack.
One typical traditional response to a threat is to retreat
to safety. In pre-history that meant
running back to your cave as fast as your legs could carry you. In a modern company
it manifests itself as a search for `truth` and consensus through analysis and
data gathering.
But as the German military strategist Helmuth von Moltke
once remarked `No battle plan survives contact with the enemy`. So if chaos is the order of day how are we
supposed to lead our enterprises out of the early stage and avoid subsequent
decline?
I’d argue that this search for the `right answer` only slows
the decision making process and makes the organisation even more vulnerable. Speed
is of the essence and, in truth, more often than not good enough is good enough because
we have to attack continually - to disrupt or be disrupted. The only safety
lies with always being ahead of the game.
And to do that requires being in a state of continuous turnaround.
Culture of innovation
The challenge for entrepreneurial leaders, then, if they are
to build sustainable value in their businesses is to create a culture of
innovation that is both top-down and bottom-up.
This means encouraging and using talent wherever it is found - from a
company’s own staff, its partners, universities and business schools and so on.
Successful modern leadership too is predicated on
authenticity - `walking the talk`. To nurture
innovation requires making change the norm and demonstrably allowing staff to
try new things without fear of failure. This necessitates understanding the
difference between control and guidance.
Like parenting, this requires the right balance between
providing a clear governance framework and giving staff free reign otherwise culturally
corrosive disappointment will soon result. This is vitally important because, as
a company grows, it is likely that a new management of lawyers, accountants and
generalist MBAs brought into the organisation will have a more conservative
approach to implementing major change than a founder. They may quickly become consumed with
maintaining the present or replicating culture of the company from whence they
came, rather than looking to the future in the context of the organisation that
now employs them.
Shortfall in skills
This may be compounded by a shortfall in skills in
technology amongst these professionals, particularly compared to their less-experienced-in-other-respects
colleagues in different parts of the organisation. Clearly understanding the
technology platforms that are the basis of innovation let alone the core of
most highly successful entrepreneurial companies is now a pre-requisite. But
it’d be my observation that too few are building technology skills into
succession planning at higher levels or making it a requirement for leadership recruitment.
Too often this results in founder having to re-take the
reins. Witness Bill Gates, back at Microsoft. He's guiding new CEO Satya Nadella as
the former CEO Steve Ballmer admitted that, as Gates’ attention was consumed by
his Foundation, he wasted decade as mobility changed the company’s world and
more agile competitors appeared in the majority of its business segments. Still, Ballmer’s now got a nice new playing field in the shape of the Los Angeles Clippers NBA team on which to focus his bluster and blow his own billions. I suspect Gates will be steering well clear on this occasion.
0 comments:
Post a Comment